Heading
Heading
Strategic Legal Protection for Directors and SeniorExecutives
Allegations of gross misconduct are life-altering. They threaten notonly your current role but your professional reputation, future career prospects, and financial stability. At Dransfield Partners, we specialise in defending directors and senior executives against such allegations, particularly those raised with ulterior motives or lacking a robust evidentiary basis.
We provide rapid, pragmatic, and definitive advice. Whether you arefacing an internal investigation or have already been dismissed, we offer a preliminary consultation to evaluate your case and outline a strategic pathforward.
Understanding Gross Misconduct: The "Grey Areas"
There is no singular legal definition of gross misconduct.
While employers have the discretion to define it, the law requires theconduct to involve deliberate wrongdoing or gross negligence that fundamentally breaches the employment relationship.
Employers often use "gross misconduct" as a tool forexpedited dismissal. However, expediency does not equate to fairness. Common examples include:
- Theft or Fraud: Including disputes over expenses and financial reporting.
- Falsification of Records: Unauthorized removal or alteration of company property.
- Insubordination: Refusal to follow lawful and reasonable management instructions.
- Gross Negligence: Serious failures in duty that risk the business or safety.
- Regulatory Non-Compliance: Breaches of internal policies or standards set by professional bodies like the FCA.
The Concept of "Trust and Confidence"
Many dismissals are predicated on a purported "irretrievable breakdown of trust and confidence."
This is a subjective "grey area" where we frequently findsuccessful defences.
An employer’s subjective loss of trust is not, in itself, sufficient proof of gross misconduct; it must be backed by objective evidence of a fundamental breach.
Executive Defence: The Specificity of Director Duties
Directors are held to a higher standard than typical employees.
When defending a director, the analysis must extend beyond employmentlaw to include fiduciary duties and statutory responsibilities.
A charge of gross misconduct against a director must be scrutinized against the backdrop of what is "reasonable" for someone in aposition of high-level stewardship.
Furthermore, firing a director from their employment does not automatically remove them from their office as a director or strip them of their shareholding. We manage the intersection of employment rights, company law, and equity to ensure your total position is protected.
Building your Defence: Evidence and Procedure
In gross misconduct cases, the burden of proof and the integrity of the process are everything.
Procedural Failures: You are entitled to a fair, reasonable investigation and a meaningful right of appeal. We often uncover cases whereemployers have by passed procedure or manufactured evidence to force an exit
Evidence Recovery: If you have been locked out of IT systems, we utilise statutory information requests and disclosure orders torecover the data needed to rebut allegations
Reputational Management: We understand the necessity of aclean exit. Our approach factors in the need for positive references and thepreservation of your professional standing
Take Decisive Action
If you are an employee, director, or executive facing a gross misconduct allegation, do not navigate the process alone.
